this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
30 points (71.4% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3600 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Key quotes:

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) met with President Biden Thursday night to relay the sentiments of the House Democratic Caucus regarding his reelection bid, as concerns grow within the ranks about the incumbent’s ability to beat former President Trump in November.

The meeting — revealed in a letter to colleagues Friday morning — came after Jeffries spoke with a large swath of House Democrats in the two weeks since last month’s debate, which prompted concerns about Biden’s viability at the top of the presidential ticket. . The meeting took place after Biden’s high-stakes press conference that evening, a source familiar told The Hill.

Jeffries said he passed along the “full breadth” of thoughts he heard within his caucus.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Pick the old man or pick the Nazis

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Pick the old man or pick the old man who is a Nazi. Seems like a pretty easy choice to me.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Trump is 78, he's fucking old too.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Happy to pick the old man if he is the nominee, but we’re not there yet. There is still a lot of time to have someone that can actually beat the Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden could die and I'd still vote for him, or whoever the non-fascist nominee was.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would literally vote for a piece of fly encrusted dog shit than a fucking fascist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's put that to the test, shall we?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mother needs him home by supper

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

If he wasn't such a bigoted homophobe that caused an AIDS epidemic in Indiana I misght almost have pity for the man.

But he is and I don't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Pick the old man as nominee, and you'll get the Nazis in January.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, the Nazi is also an old man

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

A diaper wearing old man.

No offense to the incontinent, I'm just going to have to insist that fascist "strongmen" at least be not quite that obviously fraudulent. It's embarrassing.