I think the article that people were posting about had a stance of "you shouldn't have a concept of an inherent/essential stratification of sexual 'value' amongst men [or anyone], because that is the same idea that fuels incels".
Most people who are sexually frustrated should be reachable with assertions like "no one is universally unfuckable", "attractiveness is subjective and heavily based on personality", "there's a flip side of people who won't consider you, which is people you wouldn't consider", "there is no one who is objectively better to date, only people who are subjectively better for you" and "there is no perfect match for you, everyone in this world and it's okay to be short of perfect". If they don't accept any of this, then they have chosen to be horrible on the inside and should be pilloried as such.
It's also worth saying that the internet makes this worse. If your reference point is the people around you that you interact with, it's more likely that you'll adapt to them. If your reference point is this abstract idea of what relational success looks like, based on images that you do not interact with, backed up by a bunch of stories about other people's relational failures or non-starters, you're more likely to develop a self-hating nihilistic approach to your own sexuality.