this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
393 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A senior Trump advisor shared a video that seems to show an NBC reporter badmouthing Republican presidential candidates. It appears AI was used to imitate the reporter's voice.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 91 points 8 months ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 8 months ago (3 children)

First demand, then sue. Can't get the suit to court if you can't show that you tried asking first.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Also, even if you’re suing - litigation can take months/years. But the damage is done instantly. I don’t think there’s an easy solution here.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

There's a quote for everything, almost like we've been through exactly this before...

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Easy solution is for People to stop being such utter idiots. So, you are correct, never happening.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

You can, the main difference is that if they refuse you can prove stuff like intent to demand higher damages

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's not true. You don't have to ask someone to stop committing defamation before suing them for defamation.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The video in question, shared by a top Trump adviser, opens with authentic footage of NBC News senior Capitol Hill correspondent Garrett Haake previewing the debate for the network. It soon cuts to video of each candidate as a voiceover — in Haake’s voice — makes disparaging comments about the candidates.

“This is Ron DeSantis: An establishment RINO that wears insoles in order to look taller,” the voiceover says. “And this is Nikki Haley: Nobody really gives a shit about Nikki Haley.”

I guarantee you there are a significant number of Trump fans to whom it wouldn't even occur that an NBC news correspondent wouldn't intentionally say 'shit' on a national news broadcast.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Yep. The teabaggers are not really known for being all that sentient.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago

Welp, you helped create the monster, NBC, starting with The f’ing Apprentice . Good luck to you, now.'

[–] [email protected] 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It will be interesting what this form of yellow journalism will look like in a few short years...

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have a feeling it will be quick and nasty. Deep fakes aren't just behind a door, it's a floodgate waiting to be opened.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Also works both ways making it even worse. Actually catch someone saying something abhorrent on a hot mic? It was AI, I swear.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if it's an even fight. There's actual video of Trump saying any number of disgusting (or even non-republican things, like that time he proposed to take people's guns without due process), and it's not affecting his support.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Yeah, in the specific case of Trump. Someone much more savvy at not screwing up/not getting caught is bound to use the excuse successfully eventually.

That's what happens when you let the already rich and powerful control the entire system: they get away with anything up to and including "shooting a guy in the middle of Fifth Avenue".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

works both ways

No way. On one side you have a crazed cult of emotionally driven, "poorly educated", violent dolts who refuse the truth while seeking any possible outrage against their non-crazy "enemies".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

They didn't say "both sides". They're saying that a flood of AI bullshit also makes real information harder to trust, which is true.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Here is the video. It is actually pretty funny. I hate Trump as much as the next lemming, but this really is an obvious parody once you watch the whole video. I think NBC is complaining not because of the parody, but because the fake voice-over is too good and sets a bad precedent. It shows how good the tech is and how it could be used more subtly to create fake news (not that there aren't already many ways to do that).

https://x.com/lacivitac/status/1722390782387089643?s=46&t=a3ohj6oncFjZ8uOAQMEdJg

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

It's not really that obvious that it's a parody. You're right about the voice-over being too good and it's a very very dangerous precedent.

I'm actually really worried about the complete inability for viewers of media to know what's real and what's fake given how good the tech is. I know not to trust almost anything on the internet, but so many people don't know that.

There's probably a good case for NBC to sue over this.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. This isn't about hating Trump, it's about a potentially powerful tool becoming basically free, with the potential to ruin the ability to trust our own eyes and ears.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

While the wilfully ignorant majority believe everything they see and hear. Which is why it was done in the first place.

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." Etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I laughed, at first, but now I simply feel fear for the future where anything could be a lie. And if everything's a lie, nothing is the truth. Much of the world stands in a terrifying post-truth political reality as AI begins to take off to enable it.

When nothing is true, anything is possible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have that same feeling in my gut. I imagine we'll need to create AI to find and counter the AI being used to create the fake news? It feels like an arms race that could escalate quickly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Truth vs Disinformation in the social media age is a war that will always favor the liar.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago

Agreed. It's clearly intended to be funny. The fact that people are losing their minds about this and think it should be legally actionable are a) wrong, and b) terrifying me, because this is clearly parody and protected by the first amendment. I hate Trump too, but that doesn't mean we should seek to set legal precedent that limits the ability of people to make fun of the political process. Sheesh. That goes nowhere good.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

Well, we warned you all, but you didn't listen. Expect tons of this garbage next year, and more importantly, expect it to work.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We are just starting the misinformation age, it will get worse

[–] Cethin 7 points 8 months ago

I would say before we were in the misinformation age. I think I'd call this coming stuff the disinformation age. Disinformation existed before, but this is another level. Creating totally new information to mislead people is somewhat different that misrepresenting what happened.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately I think we've been living in it for awhile already. All you need to do is say a thing with a big enough platform and the people decide if they want to believe it or not. They don't care if it's factual, they just care who's saying it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Good to see from NBC.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Video posted November 8. Little late…