454
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 108 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The federal term for this is "brandishing" and while that isn't specifically listed in Indiana state laws, intimidation is illegal.

After watching the video, I don't know that I'd say he was showing them the gun to be intimidating. Quite the opposite, it made him look cowary and small. I can understand why the students felt uncomfortable, but I don't know that a prosecutor could make the case for intimidation.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

Yeah. Despite fucked up beliefs we was engaged in respectful dialogue which is better than most

[-] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

Just showing a holstered weapon is not inherently "brandishing".

[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Right, brandishing implies intent to intimidate or threaten someone. That's why I said in the second paragraph it doesn't seem like he's trying to be intimidating. To be clearer, what I should have said is "the term in question is brandishing" and the answer is "no, he wasn't brandishing his weapon."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Yeah if that were the case, police with a pistol on their hip or anyone open carrying would be brandishing. A bunch of states have permitless open carry. I think you have to have the gun in your hand to be guilty of brandishing, although I'm sure laws vary from state to state.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Ehh, He unconcealed it on purpose. It's still not enough to be brandishing but he was doing it to make a point.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nope.

In Indiana, this would fall under intimidation. Which is threats to modify or coerce behavior (without justification, I suppose,).

She said it herself in the video. “I feel unsafe… that makes me feel unsafe.” Clearly the gesture (which was hardly needed,) was viewed as threatening.

Depending on the state, brandishing may have more specific meanings, but generally, any attempt to call attention to the weapon (like exposing it on your hip,) is a use of force. More commonly, for example, putting your hand on the weapon.

In ~8 years of reviewing incidents for between 300 and 800 armed security guards; I’ve never seen any sort of “I’m armed!” - including displaying or putting a hand on it (without drawing) ever actually descalate. It was always either going to be drawn, anyhow, or never needed in the first.

It does, however, give the subject time to escalate themselves. So it always makes things worse.

The fact this guy never actually acknowledged that he had made his (presumed) constituents - aka highschool kids - feel unsafe, says either he’s too fucking unaware to carry a firearm, too fucking dumb to be a state legislator, or scaring her was exactly what he wanted.

Probably all three.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I got stopped by plainclothes cops one time and I wasn’t even sure if they were really cops, and one guy said “yeah, here’s my badge and this is my gun” and showed me. I was just oh, okay, but it came up in court, and the issue was it could be seen as intimidating (the cop lied and said it didn’t happen!).

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

All the cop had to do was show their badge and ID. No gun required to prove that they were a cop.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

But the gun makes their dick hard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 72 points 5 months ago

Proving that any unhinged moron can get a gun and be elected by Conservatives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 52 points 5 months ago

That’s called brandishing, and it’s usually a crime.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah and if there is no brandishing law in Indiana this could be viewed as possible assault. (Offen assault is the threat of violence, battery is the action of violence)

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago

Real men don't need props.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

That's why i never understood the angle of guns and big trucks are things deemed manly. I live on a super steep place, when i see dudes on bicycles, just huffing up there like a machine, i always think: what a bloke. When i see some ridiculous truck in my small town i just see a clown. Same with guns, it's okay you're scared of the worldbor think you'rs some sort of redneck aveenger.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't understand why you think only rednecks have firearms. The world has changed, a large majority of firearm owners are not rednecks. Trump helped that.

[-] Cethin 4 points 5 months ago

Sure, but I've met very few lefties who advertise it. Owning a gun isn't really a part of most people's personality if they aren't crazy people.

I like responsible gun ownership. You should be required to show competence with your firearm, both in usage an maintenance and storage, to own it though. You should have to go through a course (funded by taxes to ensure poorer people aren't left out) before your purchase, and probably prove you have a safe place to store it and knowledge on how and why to store it.

(Firearms are the most stolen item, and the idiots with unsecured firearms or in safes locked with "1776" have caused part of the illegal gun crises.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

I think many of the guys out there carrying in a big truck are simply cosplaying what they think a "real man" is. They want to be cowboys in their shiny F150 trucks with Carhartts and a pistol, but actually work a desk job and have no need for any of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 35 points 5 months ago

... call the cops. that's intimidation right there.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago

Yeah. I thought if you were concealed carrying, any interaction with your gun that was visible from displaying, peaking, drawing all the way to pointing was considered a criminal threat.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago

indiana law, apparently they call it 'intimidation'. He opened his jacket and displayed it with the intention of modifying their behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It depends on where you at, honestly. Showing off a concealed carry is just stupid anyway as the entire point is not to let people know you have a weapon.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

see the link. that's to Inidiana's law on the matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Except the cops are on his side....

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

prolly. But they still at least have to respond. but a police report citing the incident looks pretty bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago

Wow, everyone must have been so impressed.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago

“emotional support firearms”

[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

Jim Lucas is such a piece of shit. He only makes my piece of shit Indiana representative (Larry Buschon) look like less of a piece of shit in comparison.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

"Whoa, we have a badass here"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago

Indiana: The Alabama of the Midwest

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

"He's got a gun. Shoot him!"

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

I mean… if you’re going to carry, don’t talk about it. Carrying is basically something that only makes the one carrying feel safer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

to anyone who understand this behavior - what's the man trying to do here? Is there any charitable read? Having a hard time imagining it.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

I didn't watch the video, but it sounds like it was in the context of discussing self defense. A student asked if he meant people should carry guns, so he showed that he was carrying one in an attempt to confirm that he practices what he preaches. He was probably also trying to normalize it. Pretty dumb, but obviously not intending to intimidate the kids.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you watch the video, it clearly didn’t seem like any kind of intentional intimidation. Definitely a whoopsie since brandishing is illegal in most but not his state. But we should be charitable to compensate for our own biases and I think the title is a bit misleading about the context

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

It's a good thing THOSE kids didn't have Guns otherwise they would have Shot him in Self Defense! That's how it works right Conservatives?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I live in IN. Many times I wish I didn't.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

My state is an absolute shithole.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
454 points (96.7% liked)

politics

18080 readers
3770 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS