They have Radio Free Asia as a greenlisted reliable source here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

So anything on Radio Free Asia is considered verified by Wikipedia's standards.

Radio Free Asia is openly a branch of the USA's government. It was created by Bill Clinton's government.

Ctrl+F Radio Free Asia on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China gives 32 results

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism

gangster

Lol

Every time Amerika commits evil, it's "allegations":

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_drug_trafficking_allegations

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_United_States_support_for_the_Khmer_Rouge

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegations_of_biological_warfare_in_the_Korean_War

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusations_of_United_States_complicity_in_Israeli_war_crimes_in_the_Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war

Even the Native American genocide gets the passive tense

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_genocide_in_the_United_States

I know we have a tendency to notice specifically the aspects of Wikipedia that consolidate the worldview of the State Department, but it seems there's also some very active Catholic editing to discredit any critique of any popes. I fell into a wild Wikipedia rabbit hole last year on this topic, and the more "Talk" pages I read and edits I followed I now think there's some Vatican deep state that has a small but dedicated Wikipedia army lol.

Anyways my favourite of the thing you're looking for is that the most closely guarded claim I've seen on Wikipedia is on the Working Time page: "Standard working hours of countries worldwide are around 40 to 44 hours per week (but not everywhere: from 35 hours per week in France[4] to up to 105 hours per week in North Korean labor camps)]. Source? A defector who left Korea 30 years ago who said "Those accommodated are mobilized for forced labor from 5:00am to 7:00pm in winter, and till 8:00pm in summer."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_genocide_accusation

Vs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China

(It used to be worse, because the latter article used to be called "Uyghur genocide")

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience

Found myself here a while back. Was having fun reading up ancient aliens and stuff and then saw they listed Historical Materialism. Their reason? Some conservative philosopher said "nu uh"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinnytsia_massacre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_Commission

Accusations that the NKVD killed a bunch of Ukrainians and Poles for absolutely no reason other than "Stalin was evilly twirling his moustache"

Sources cited:

1. Nazi Germany
2. An "independent international commission" made up entirely of "experts" from Nazi-occupied Europe which were handpicked by the Nazi government, and agreed fully with initial Nazi "findings"
3. A bunch of other random sources citing the "independent commission"

Note how the Katyn Commission article goes out of its way to avoid the word "Nazi," only saying "Germany" and "Reich"

If you want a great example of "Our noble government; Their perfidious regime" or however the meme goes, compare these articles:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daeseong-dong

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijong-dong

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_van

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazar_hypothesis_of_Ashkenazi_ancestry is pretty bad. It makes the scientific literature seem much more one-sided than it is.

Ashkenazi Jews have genetic contributions from all over the place. There's a political push to say they're originally native to the Levant because of..... well actually I don't know why they're pushing that line it's a total mystery.

Wikipedia says "While the consensus in genetic research is that the world's Jewish populations (including the Ashkenazim) share substantial genetic ancestry derived from a common Ancient Middle Eastern founder population, and that Ashkenazi Jews have no genetic ancestry attributable to Khazars" and cites Behar et al. (2013). "No Evidence from Genome-Wide Data of a Khazar Origin for the Ashkenazi Jews" to support that claim. But you can't cite one 2013 study and call that citation evidence of "consensus". And the papers citing Behar et al. take a variety of positions on it. It's a lie to call it a consensus.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor_genocide_question

While apparently unbiased and posting both sides of a discussion, this one sucks too. For a detailed breakdown of the sources, see https://youtu.be/3kaaYvauNho

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_of_Kyiv

Geez, I don't know. I would need a tool that can conveniently grab me every single page on Wikipedia that talks about Russian and Ukraine to get it all out.

Or maybe this one alone will tell you everything.

This was my favorite line in the Cycling in North Korea article, although it's now finally been removed because it seems to have been too much even for NATOpedia.

As with other reports from North Korea, whether the bicycle-sharing program is intended as a service for actual use by citizens (and not simply propaganda) cannot be confirmed.

We can't possibly know whether nefarious North Korea intends bicycle sharing to be mere propaganda.

This isn't propaganda, exactly, but it has the vibes of anti-Marxist misinformation (is that a thing?): Character mask. It's absolutely incomprehensible and reads like an essay by someone obsessed with the history and theory of Marxism in a weird, unproductive way (you know those types). Naturally, it has remained essentially unchanged for a decade. Bonus points if anyone can figure out what micro-ideology its author is pushing, because I really can't tell.

The Wikipedia article on me calls me a nerd

doing a big brain over here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

If you want some pure distilled cringe there's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_political_jokes

The South African all-white settler town of Orania has a Wikipedia page that is way too in-depth for a town of its size, and the page seems much too kind to this extraordinarily racist settlement.

I just googled "Vietnam". The first website result I got was Wikipedia, and instead of any of the information that came before it in the page, the information it decided to show me on the search page was "Vietnam is a developing country with a lower-middle-income economy. It has high levels of corruption, censorship, ..."