this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
165 points (99.4% liked)

news

23360 readers
609 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Putin goes on to say

”Our proposal is not to freeze the conflict, like how the west wants it, but to end it. I repeat, this is not to freeze the conflict, but for its final completion.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Sounda reasonable considering all the situation but western MIC oligarchs won't let Ukraine take that deal100%

[–] [email protected] 100 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This isn't reasonable, this is crazily generous, especially considering the state of the war. Only thing Ukraine lose is places that already publicly stated they don't want to be in Ukraine. But in that proposition they don't lose Odessa and with it the Black Sea access, they don't lose Kharkov, they stay as viable state instead of rump remains, they don't have to denazify, they won't have to change government, and the most importantly, killing stops now.

Yeah, no chance their handlers will allow them to agree.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Those are incredibly reasonable terms

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago

I haven't kept up with shit in Ukraine well the past few months but this was my uneducated, gut reaction as well. Seems super reasonable.

Of course, they won't be going for it since their donors won't let them.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

Definitely a reasonable point to start negotiations. The Russians barely hold anything in Kherson, but you don't start where you want. Otherwise, you don't have any leeway in negotiations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I'm not that up to date, so I would like to ask other people: why now? Has Russia decided that the war is too costly to be worthwhile continuing, or does Putin expect that he has demonstrated that Ukraine could never win a war against Russia? I know he's proposed private peace deals, and I imagine they had similar terms.

Either way, I really doubt Zelesky will accept peace. This war has been way to beneficial for America. They've bought up public Ukranian assets, blown up the Nord Stream, made a shit load of money selling arms, cultivated massively successful propaganda, made Europe way more dependant on them, and so on. Zelesky would probably be being paid a visit from the men in black if he accepted this deal.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They’ve probably been offering this deal privately for more than a year now. I guess at this point they feel it’s been long enough to demonstrate that Ukraine can’t kick them out even with NATO weapons. They’re making the offer public to put pressure on Zelenskyy and make him seem less reasonable with his completely unrealistic hard position of pre-2014 borders.

How well it will work I don’t know.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 months ago

public proposal to cut through the narratives they're spinning in Kiev, i imagine the expectation is that Ukrainians & especially conscripts will hear 'lose the troublesome provinces for peace' and rally to pressure the government. for Russia, a withdrawal of Ukraine's troops will achieve what would probably take months in terms of territory, despite the 'Ukraine is collapsing' hype Russia hasn't exactly been making rapid progress

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago (3 children)

my best guess would be that this weekend is the swiss peace summit where they invited like ninety countries but not russia. putting out the barest, most basic sounding demands is an easy play when you aren’t even invited to the current version of peace talks. it’ll make ukraine’s demands for crimea, belgorod, kaliningrad, and billion dollar annual reparations look ridiculous in a few days, if the talks even get that far. you’re right that the west isn’t done, but the west is the one cooking up this swiss conference

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 months ago (2 children)

lmao “peace talks” where one side isn’t invited

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago

I think this is just about setting the legal precedent, make sure that there are official negotiations more recent than April '22. This refusal will certainly be referenced in the future when they will make further demands using this as a justification i.e you had the chance, you refused and caused even more harm, therefore we are in our right to demand further compensation.

There are also other factors to consider, the situation for Ukrainian civilians is getting worse, electricity is almost completely out and it is going to get much worse. Putting an official record that Russia is willing to end the war now is certainly going to affect a significant part of the population.

Obviously its not like stupid democracy shit is real at all, they're not going to protest their way into a peace deal with Russia, but this can lead to civil unrest which means even less manpower which just ultimately means Russia continues to steamroll.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago

How DARE Putler™ reiterate the ceasefire conditions that haven't changed since the start of the conflict!

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So what would this mean for those four regions? Fully subsumed into Russia? Becoming an independent country but identifying as ethnically Russian? Staying Ukrainian but granted some sort of semi-autonomous status?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

iirc DPR and LPR are already part of Russia, they would need to do new paperwork on Kherson and Zapo though

EDIT: I did not recall correctly

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Kherson and Zaporozhye are already part of Russia too.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

my vibes-based reading:

  • this is in response to the peace conference (the one russia isn't invited to lol), not any major shifts on the battlefield or in the geopolitical situation

  • the target audience is the ukrainian public, not the ukrainian/western leadership

  • the russian government knows there's no chance ukraine is willing (or able) to accept this ceasefire proposal. that doesn't necessarily mean they're not prepared to follow through should ukraine agree, but the extremely generous terms they're presenting here are probably based on the assumption that ukraine will immediately reject it.

  • when ukraine is eventually forced to the negotiation table, the russian proposal will be far less generous.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

of course this very reasonable list will be framed as evil putler's ravings 😈

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ukraine and their backers aren't capable of agreeing to this, they're just too deep in the fantasy. The only reason I can think of for making this declaration again, which is really just a call for Ukraine to recognize the current reality of the situation, is for posterity.

A last off ramp before the Russians commit more and then demand more for resolution. It could only be a matter of time before Russia insists on Kharkiv oblast as a response to the terror bombing of civilians in Belgorod.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I think Ukraine will accept the peace terms and here is my analysis for why:
Hexbear was wrong about invading Ukraine, therefore it will be wrong about how the war ends. Also clownworld

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago

Ukraine will never ever ever ever accept the peace deal, nope, will never happen, we will also never solve climate change ever, ever, ever, Palestine will never be free either ever, never, nope, everything is completely hopeless and we will never achieve communism

{|I hope this works}

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›