this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
151 points (91.3% liked)

World News

38237 readers
3573 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All new cars must have the devices from 7 July, adding fuel economy as well as safety. Will mpg become the new mph?

In the highway code and the law courts, there is no doubt what those big numbers in red circles mean. As a quick trip up any urban street or motorway with no enforcement cameras makes clear though, many drivers still regard speed signs as an aspiration rather than a limit.

Technology that will be required across Europe from this weekend may change that culture, because from 7 July all new cars sold in the EU and in Northern Ireland must have a range of technical safety features fitted as standard. The most notable of these is intelligent speed assistance – or colloquially, a speed limiter.

The rest of the UK is theoretically free, as ministers once liked to put it, to make the most of its post-Brexit freedoms, but the integrated nature of car manufacturing means new vehicles here will also be telling their drivers to take their foot off the accelerator. Combining satnav maps with a forward camera to read the road signs, they will automatically sound an alarm if driven too fast for the zone they are in.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Will mpg become the new mph?

No because Europeans use neither mpg nor mph. 🤭

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

This sounds like blown up bullshit.
How does this speed limiter work exactly, I don't see that mentioned anywhere.
If I drive Autobahn it's not the same as driving passed a school in the city. How does the speed limiter know the speed limit?
To know that accurately, sounds like a somewhat expensive mandatory piece of equipment.
And how come I have heard absolutely zero about this from either car reviewers or local news media?

I looked it up for my country (Denmark), these are NOT mandatory that I can find, and they can ONLY be installed by public authorized shops, and from the paperwork required, it seems like the installer decides the limit, there are no mandatory limits.

So it seems like the whole story is bullshit.

EDIT:

https://road-safety-charter.ec.europa.eu/resources-knowledge/media-and-press/intelligent-speed-assistance-isa-set-become-mandatory-across

Intelligent speed assistance seems to be a thing, but this is a pretty crucial part:

The ISA system is required to work with the driver and not to restrict his/her possibility to act in any moment during driving. The driver is always in control and can easily override the ISA system.

From the OP the Guardian article:

Drivers of most new cars will be familiar with similar features already installed, but they are currently easy to override.

Yes and that's how it will continue to be with Intelligent speed assistance.

Article is bullshit these are NOT speed limiters, which is a completely different thing, despite that I can see numerous articles in English erroneously calling this speed limiters, when it's nothing of the sort.

Otherwise, what's an ACTUAL speed limiter called? You know like what is popular in many new cars, that have speed limiters that prevent you from driving faster than for instance 160 km/h.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In Canada we call them engine governors and they've been around for decades (mostly on semis/tractor trailer units).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I know most Mercedes cars have had speed limiters for many years, but those were traditionally at 250 km/h.
An engine governor sounds more like preventing revving it to high.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Combining satnav maps with a forward camera to read the road signs, they will automatically sound an alarm if driven too fast for the zone they are in."

"From now on, however, cars will be designed with systems that are impossible to permanently turn off, restarting each time the engine does. Will car lovers see this as pure progress?"

It doesn't sound hard to disable... speakers only have 2 wires. Snip-Snip.

You aren't disabling the system, that still works fine, it just has no output.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

IIRC it's not an audio alarm, the car will push back on the pedal so that if you push past the limit it will need a bit more force.

And even if they were just speakers, they would most likely be the main speakers, so you'd be taking out your sound system.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Well it will be harder to argue against fines etc. you where warned and either ignored the warning or disabled the warning and accepted the risk.

With the height of fines in some countries...

I'd imagine the next step will the even stricter measurements, harsher fines and more SPECS.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (15 children)

The one thing nobody is fixing is the constant phone use in cars. This issue is far more common than speeding and creates jams and dangerous situations all the time. Makes me hate being a part of traffic. I tend to speed by about 10% on highways but never in 30 and 50 zones. The very idea of a "smart" car taking control of my brake, throttle or steering makes me wanna barf.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Cars are, themselves, the problem. We've created a two ton rolling death machine and now we're stuck adding more and more features to address the original sin of unleashing them across the country to begin with.

The very idea of a “smart” car taking control of my brake, throttle or steering makes me wanna barf.

Its that, or people will be forced to endure the unlimited nightmare indignity of taking the train/bus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

My car lets me set a threshold - currently +7mph. I can see on the dashboard when I’ve exceeded my self-imposed threshold, vs when I am between that and the actual speed limit. Actually I wish it would do a bit more, like turn yellow.

I also ignore it in crowded areas, and pedestrian crossings, school zones, construction zones with people working, etc.

Although I’m really pissed at whoever thought the wide straight parkway leading through the woods up to my workplace is 15 mph. That’s the reason people ignore speed limits

However it is not set by anyone but me, never limits the vehicle, doesn’t make noise, and doesn’t get reported to anyone (as far as I know).

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

My comment on US plans to make impaired driving detectors mandatory also applies to these speed limiters.. I admire the desire to make it safer, but holy shit are car manufacturers going to jump on this opportunity to sell out all of your driving data to insurance companies, causing your rates to randomly double and removing any semblance of privacy, and it will also involve additional parts and sensors that will be as closely corner cut as legally allowed such that it breaks as frequently as possible.

a "safe" idea, sure, do I want it, absolutely not, and I will never trust a corporation to implement it 'correctly'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They already sell you all that data sorry to tell ya. Never allow your car to access your contact list unless ya want the manufacturer to sell that data off too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Well, they don't sell that from me, because I drive a car that's 31 years old lmfao. No car built past 2014 has any kind of draw for me, specifically because of these kinds of privacy invasions and general corporate bullshittery.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Is it a little beep or a constant alarm? I can't imagine that many drivers would tolerate having a constant alarm.

I'm in the USA and my impression here is that currently safety advocates are happy to set very low speed limits, drivers are happy to ignore those speed limits, and so everything works out. If speed limits were actually consistently enforced, I imagine there would be a lot of push-back against the politicians responsible.

We need to breed a new generation of drivers who find driving in a more relaxed manner can be just as rewarding.

I don't see that happening.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Road engineers are happy to design streets to encourage higher speeds than is safe as well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Come to my town. If you obey the speed limit you hit almost every light on red. Do 5-10 mph over and you hit most on green.

If you are at a red, the light will not change most times until there is a decent amount of traffic coming from another direction. When they get closer, they will get a red and you get a green. Making them stop.

I want to meet the idiots who designed this system.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

there are many people who don't want to drive, don't care about the act of driving, and don't respect the vehicle.
it would help if these people weren't forced to drive.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I like how we collectively create nanny-states, then turn around and bitch when the cops have too much power. I hate how there really isn't any good solution to many problems because of the human factor.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Hard to accuse the state of being a nanny when so many act like children. Being a child is fine, but not when driving a 2,000kg object at speed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I don't see why nanny-state can't be nanny about cops. You can both apply speed limiters and hold cops accountable for their actions.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My dad got something similar build into his car, its wrong so many times especially when road signs are confusing at construction sites.

Example: Construction site limits speed to 60kmh and there is an exit coming up that goes through the actual construction site, that has a speed limit on the the exit of 30kmh, guess what. The car sees the 30kmh sign but doesnt understand its only for cars exiting but alarms the driver now until.the next 60kmh sign.

So in order for this to work properly road signs have to be normalized all around the EU, which i don't see happening anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn’t see anywhere in the article how this will be implemented. Are we sure it uses sign recognition as opposed to GPS or some other method?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

My car uses a mix of GPS and camera, and I'm using Android Auto, which uses only GPS. There are several cases where both are wrong either

  • because the camera got confused by signs
  • the GPS data are not up to date

So yeah that's going to be fun... Like my car telling me I should drive a 30 limit instead of 110 on the highway (did happen several times)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Gps will never know accidents, construction or anything alike that is temporary

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Will mpg become the new mph?

We don't use miles here.

edit: article is UK?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Hard to argue against"

No, it's really quite easy to argue against them.

I live in a rural area. If I call an ambulance, that's a minimum--minimum--of 20 minutes for any ambulance to get to me. Then it's another 20 minutes to get to an emergency room. I know someone who is a doctor that lives close to me, and their husband got stung by a bunch of yellow jackets. Their husband is allergic. They gave their husband a shit ton of meds, and made it to the ER in under 15 minutes. As it was, he barely avoided getting put on a ventilator, and that was with perfect care and driving 90+ mph on two lane mountain roads to get to a hospital. (He has an epinephrine pen now.) With a "smart" speed limiter on their car? He wouldn't have been breathing by the time they got to the ER.

When you live in a rural area, and emergency help is a long way away (honestly, 20 min ain't that bad compared to other parts of the state where it can be more like 45+ minutes just to get an ambulance out), it's really, really easy to argue against that kind of nanny state nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Presumably ambulances and other such emergency vehicles would be exempt from such devices? But I agree with you anyway since ambulances are expensive and having to choose between driving slow in your own car with a limiter and calling for an ambulance and going bankrupt should not be a choice someone has to make in a split second during an emergency.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ambulances are expensive? Tell me you are from the USA, without telling me you are from the USA.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I am. It's a real fuckin' problemo. Ambulances are actually kinda rare to see these days because people around where I live call rideshares to take them to the hospital instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I wish regulations like this would help people realize that all along they were casual racing enthusiasts, and then spending time on the track for a few hours would become a weekend activity for many. Then we’d see an explosion of track cars vs grocery cars, and more tracks everywhere. That would be a positive outcome of something like this, per my pov.

Perhaps this type of speeding regulation is also meant to help self driving cars? I am guessing that monitoring and predicting the variable speed of many other vehicles on the road is quite a task.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, please. We need more Mazda MX-5s, less SUVs on the road and in terms of offers from car manufacturers. I know, technically not a track car, but you can still have lots of fun with it on the track without spending several peoples' kidneys worth.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Tape over camera will somehow make it from laptop screens to car windshields. Or you can reflash the control units.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cops in America will hate this tech. All of that ticket revenue will go out of the window.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was wondering when this would finally become a thing. It makes a lot of sense.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It’s already a pretty common feature. My car has a speed limit sign reader and flashes a warning on the screen when you reach the speed limit.

It also has a button to set the car’s speed limiter to the detected speed limit.

It gets it wrong quite frequently though. Sometimes it misses signs and other times it picks up a sign on a side road that goes ahead where the road that you are on turns. I don’t know how it decides to handle national speed limit signs - sometimes it shows a national speed limit sign on the dash but other times it shows 60 or 70 instead.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My car happily understands 10tonn signs as 10km/h limit, or pedestrian crossings as motorway (130km/h max). It also hss zero awareness if a speed limit is still relevant (eg have we passed an intersection since).

I don't have high trust in this tech currently.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah they are passing laws before the tech has caught up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›