660
And after jerking off her date in a public venue
Sex ed’s not gonna help too much with this one.
A handy’s generally one of the safest forms of sex, and I don’t think they tell you where to have sex in school, at least they didn’t when I was around.
No but we’re sitting and saying kids should never learn about sex, and then doing this in public w children on-site which inevitably spurs questions, I’d imagine
She was juicing the beetle.
Thank god she wasn’t juicing the weasel
Or … wheezin the juice
Wheezin’ the ju-uice!
buuuUHdy
No wheezing the juice!
Honestly, that's a significant improvement over the sex ed we get here in Texas.
The teen pregnancies are the point
If they spend all their alimony surviving and taking care of their kid, they can't spend time thinking about the shite job the republicans are doing.
Keep them poor, keep them ignorant and profit.
Yeah but that's just basic republican 101, be a massive fucking hypocrite about everything.
Republican logic: "I get to tell you what to do, but you didn't get to tell me what to do."
Sorry to be pedantic but this isn't being a hypocrite is it? I see it more like absolute ignorance, tiger ate my face, refusal to acknowledge science data and facts, etc that is also all very republican 101. But for once idk how hypocrite just thr extra layer of stupid
Edit (and gonna reply to this edit the same thing cuz lemmy sucks at showing them and this is important) Ok I read another comment and it definitely put into context for me how this is hypocrital too!!!! They wanna protect the children while doing this shit in unexpected places in front of children where it is much more graphic, traumatizing, and upsetting than the sanitized facts you're getting , in an environment you're anticipating and prepared for it and can sorta joke with classmates too ....
They wanna outlaw that but she's down to whip a dick out and get sloppy in public.
Edit (and gonna reply to this edit the same thing cuz lemmy sucks at showing them and this is important) Ok I read another comment and it definitely put into context for me how this is hypocrital too!!!! They wanna protect the children while doing this shit in unexpected places in front of children where it is much more graphic, traumatizing, and upsetting than the sanitized facts you're getting , in an environment you're anticipating and prepared for it and can sorta joke with classmates too ....
They wanna outlaw that but she's down to whip a dick out and get sloppy in public.
I didn't know that her teenage son had gotten pregnant.
That's how bad it can get without sex-ed.
You may think you're making a fun point, but teenage girls don't get pregnant just by showing their midriff and the occasional bra strap, typically a teenage boy is equally participating in the pregnancy. We're pregnant make a lot more sense than She's pregnant, and I'm just window dressing. Bobbert raised morons who couldn't or wouldn't wear a condom, I know a fair amount of guys my age (40s) that don't have a single kid, it's not impossible. They weren't geniuses, they just wore condoms.
Right? I feel like that would be the bigger news story, here.
Teen pregnancy is the point.
So much of the current White Replacement hysteria revolves around white woman not having enough babies.
Can't be overstated how that plays into a conservative hatred for sex ed
Yup, as far as they're concerned white girls need to become breeding slaves to save the so-called white race.
It reeks of sexual pathology.
She advocates for kids in the audience getting in person sex ed
Makes sense. The irony is strong.
She just keeps getting dumber. Alzheimers might be an improvement
Betelgeuse Betelgeuse Betelgeuse!
Ursa Minor!
Which is short for "yoU'Re Sexually Assaulting a Minor (by giving handjobs in front of them)"
Legend has it that if you say it three times and you are a constituent, Beetlebert shows up to give out a handy. If you finish up by yelling "oh $DEITY", it's considered both biblical AND Constitutional, since she thinks the separation of the two is a liberal fiction.
What does this mean?
She looks ready for the 4th of July pie eating contest!!
That’s also her musical theater face.
Every time I see a picture of her, my brain immediately says: "howler monkey."
Same thought process as people who were beat with belts and “turned out fine”.
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
660 points (99.3% liked)
politics
18138 readers
3684 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS