the long term biden and trump results ARE THE FUCKING SAME WE ALL STILL DIE
go away you freak
She actually unironically tweeted this out?
"Trump will add over 4 billion tons of CO2 to the environment", I absolutely believe he will but we're glossing over Joe adding over 3 billion? On the same chart? With the desired target CLEARLY well below that? Peak comedy.
I thought liberals were talking about 'believing science' which in this case means meeting or besting that target. I guess it's amusing they're just being this open about it being a pissing match over who sucks less
Admitting out loud that the blue team is only marginally better than the red team, who are both significantly worse than the bare fucking minimum we need to have a functioning society.
The actual peak comedy is the uncertainty areas barely intersect at the very end meaning a real possibility of literally no difference between them in the medium-long term.
Hey quick question for liberals were currently drilling for more oil than any person at any time at any point in history.
Would "more then ever anywhere" be "more" or "less" than the person before you.
How do I 
for target?
Edit: TARGET IS THE LINE THAT BIDEN PROMISED LAST ELECTION AHHHH
Listen sweaty don't let perfect be the enemy of good
At this point it's more "don't let bad be the enemy of certain death"
lol she turned off replies
She's literally sabotaging bidens campaign so she isn't famous for being "the only person who could lose an election to trump"
She absolutely strikes me as narcissistic and spiteful enough to do something like that lmao
Biden has approved more oil and gas drilling than Trump did, he’s literally been worse, what the fuck is that calculation based on
I guess this is based on Biden crashing the economies of the western developed world? That's the only way this makes any sense.
That’s right, Biden is drilling at all time record levels despite his promises to actually stop drilling on federal lands.
This is just outright fabrication by Hillary, but uh, happy earth day I guess?
Thinking back on this Ezra Klein article and smiling serenely.
Vote for 
, he'll pull the knife out 6 inches
I know you're quoting Malcolm X, but just gotta say that in this case it's more like "he'll only shove it in 6 more inches"
He's successfully slowed down the acceleration of the knife into your back
honestly yes this is a great analogy for how dems say everything is great actually and then cite some secondary metric that doesn't correlate to the conditions for everyday people
This is the climate equivalent of that unironic trolley meme the libs have been spreading where Team Blue means “only” the Palestinians getting genocided compared to a bunch of hypothetical Team Red genocides.
Jesus christ is that actually a thing in the fucking wild? I haven't seen it. Please tell me the top comment every single time its posted is "I choose to blow up the trolley".
This is literally "would you rather be shot or stabbed to death"
She can't actually be this bad at politics right this is just Andy Kauffman in a wig.
The last two times she's been in the news has been telling potential voters "fuck you, and if you don't vote for biden fuck you slightly more" and "Here's a graph showing there's no difference between the two candidates"
Like she's just actively sabotaging Biden so she isn't known as "the only person the manage to lose an election to trump" in history books
lol. lmao
How many tonnes of CO2 does providing and dropping bombs on Palestine produce?
The Biden trend line from now to 2030 seems to assume that the decline from the last year will continue uninterrupted, while the history shown on the chart shows that to clearly not be how this works at all.
oh the decline will continue uninterrupted all right
Lmao did she actually post this? How embarrassing...
It's hilarious how that graph is a perfect example of their trash heap of political parties' stance on almost everything but wE have to VoTe BluE amirite?
don't let the perfect be the enemy of the grotesquely pathetically insufficient
So by 2050 the confidence intervals will essentially overlap and the difference will not be statistically significant. Ok.
In the short term they're the same. In the long term theyre also the same. But in the medium term!
He's running
Looking at the 2020-2024 data, it's a big jump up then a small decline to a level still above 2020.
Even accounting for covid fuckery, the bottom line is Biden has not done nearly enough, so the projection for him to start doing far, far more (but still not enough!) is pure fantasy.
What the fuck is Biden going to do in 2030!? That's a very sharp turn in the curve two years after he has left office!
What the fuck is Biden going to do in 2030!?
continue being dead
I mean, yes, but why will that halt the reduction of US emission? Why did they put that sharp turn into the graph!?
because that's when we'll start doing stuff we promise, just a few more votes
Both parties will bring us to barbarism except the Dems will take the scenic route and do so a little slower.
This graph is LITERALLY pointing that out but still somehow that's being pitched as a plus 🤦♂️
I'm with HER
This is the first time i hear from her since years, she's long gone stop following her op
"dont call it a comeback, I've been posting cringe for years"
Never. It’s STILL HER TURN, dammit
can someone edit this chart to highlight the periods when Clinton and Obama did jack shit to lower carbon emissions?
Biden's line is closer to Trump's than the target lmao
She will never go away. She loves herself too much to ever do that.
Haha even Biden can't make the target
Idk I guess he 
and it's HIS target lmao, its what he committed to, not what climate scientists say is necessary or anything
Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.
Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.
Shitposting in other comms please!
