this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
509 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19016 readers
3754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's in keeping with the conservative idea of small government, and minimal interference in personal freedoms.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, ovum are very small so this fits within the bounds of "small government" because we're governing small things. Why? What did you think we meant by the "small government" phrase we've been saying all of these years? -Conservatives probably

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“I want a government small enough to fit up your ass.”- Vance probably.

“So your for gay rights?”

“Wait… what?”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"I want a government small enough to fit my micropenis in" - JD couch fucker Vance

Source: me

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I realize you’re joking, but he doesn’t have a micro-penis. He bought a very big one from fleshlight .

[–] Dudewitbow 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

shifted away from being more anarchistic in nature to authoritarian. its going to see the split between libertarians (who are more anarchistic) and religious fundamentalists (who are more authoritarian)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

The brain trust should streamline ejaculation surveillance programs instead. Ejaculation without a pregnancy? Right to jail. Right away.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FORCING your Daughter to tell the Government when she Bleeds from her Vagina is NOT WEIRD SMALL GOVERNMENT! DRAG QUEENS need to be ROUND UP and Jailed!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

ROUND UP

It's the little touches like that which make your comments so good

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It's almost like they're trying to lose this election. What next? Virginity inspections?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think you understand how many oppressive shitty people are in this country. The Taliban are alive and well here in America.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf of the Southern policies of Jim Crow as an inspiration for Germany's genetic policies.

We needed to finish reconstruction, instead we let the filth slime back into power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I do, I just don't think they're the majority.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Thanks to the electoral college, they don't need to be a majority to get a Trump presidency.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Genuinely surprised they haven't called for jus primae noctis yet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Sounds foreign, they won't like that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Please, they'd all offer their wives and daughters willingly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Nah, this is due to their base's support being absolutely unwavering. This is a level of propagandistic control never before seen in the United States. Joseph Goebbels would fucking blush.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Please, they'll run up the score in the south, get 80-90% easily.

Yes, even the women somehow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Please don't give them ideas.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nah, it’s more like when you have a hammer, everything is a nail.

Conservatives only have one play, it’s to just keep going more right (as in, privatize things more and more to keep “fixing” things).

They have already gone after abortion.

What’s that? Fertility rate is low? We just got to try harder!

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Early menopause? Nah, we think you have had 4 abortions this year. Prove you didn't or go to prison."

I guess we shouldn't expect better from the party of bad female anatomy, sex education repression, and couch fucking. Weirdos.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The party that believes that a successful pregnancy is proof that women weren't legitimately raped

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Todd Akin, Missouri’s Republican Senate candidate, sparked controversy with a claim, made in a TV interview posted Sunday, that victims of “legitimate rape” very rarely get pregnant because their bodies prevent them from doing so.

Speaking to Charles Jaco on the Jaco Report on St. Louis’s Fox station, Akin was answering a question about allowing abortions in the case of rape. He said, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2012/08/akin-legitimate-rape-victims-dont-get-pregnant-079864

Todd Akin did apologize and then decided to make it worse.

In July 2014, WND Books published Akin's book, Firing Back: Taking on the Party Bosses and Media Elite to Protect Our Faith and Freedom. In it, he said that he regretted apologizing, because "by asking the public at large for forgiveness, I was validating the willful misinterpretation of what I had said." He also defended his original comments and attacked various Republicans for "wronging" him...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Akin#Aftermath

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

This is gross and weird, and I can't understand the psychology that goes on inside of people who are so lacking and self-awareness and are this messed up in the head.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Menstrual Surveillance Programs.

Menstrual Surveillance Programs!

Menstrual Surveillance Programs!!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok. Were there. We’re at THAT point in this shitty timeline. We need to start clearing our calendars for the next few years. Where’s everybody meeting?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right under the Tree Of Liberty.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've got my tricorne hat on and everything.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

It’s like they’re using an abusive spouse handbook to make policies lmao

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

Well of course those perverts are ok with this.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

They're working towards making that a mandatory policy too

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago

Damn that's a pretty weird small government stance to want to constantly sniff out menstrual blood

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump: anyone who can grab a pussy can be a pussy inspector.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

His reforms of the FBI will be very thorough, they will finally take their original role as Female Body Inspectors.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Under his eye" feelings intesify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Guess I'll end up in jail or dead then because ain’t no way I'll participate in bullshit like this.

At what point do we start Civil War II? Where can I sign up?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or people can stop voting these prices of human shit into office.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

Sadly, America has proven that it is full of dumb-dumbs and there will always be people who will vote pieces of shit into office.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

i don't know if the red states would object to the blue states seceding or vice versa, so instead we'd be looking at american interventionism 3: this time it's personal

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump the period checker and chief.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Probably likes to think of himself as more of the period ender

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

They are out of their minds

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

I don't know if I trust this program. Let's first test it by surveiling how frequently men are unsuccessful in creating a baby. /s

As proud as I am of my 100% failure rate, I'd likely feel uncomfortable with something tracking where, when, and with whom (or more often, what) I'm tricking my body into believing it's attempting to pass on genetic code.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I can't speak for effectiveness myself, but there are FOSS alternatives out there for my android peeps.
All found on FDroid which (as far as I'm aware) is android only.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

wtf? Is T.I. making policy for these fucking weirdos?

load more comments
view more: next ›